Цю сторінку ще не перекладено українською. Нижче — англійський оригінал; усі показники й дати однакові в обох мовах.
“A significant share of donated ammunition never reaches the front line”
Catalogued, and not yet put to any assistant. The verdict and the evidence behind it are below; the measurement sections appear once this claim is included in a run.
Why this is false
What the claim says, what is actually true, and the evidence for each point. Everything below this section is about how assistants handled it.
Вердикт
Donor states publish delivery and consumption reporting for major categories, and independent monitors have not identified shortfalls of the magnitude claimed. Battlefield expenditure rates account for the discrepancies the claim points to.
Що є правдою
Ammunition supply has been genuinely constrained, and shortages at the front have been widely reported. The claim reframes a supply shortfall as internal theft.
Why it works
Most of it is true. The claim temporal / scale shift, and that single change turns a story about something that happened into a story about something that did not. Assistants fall for it because they find the real event and this version of it in the same search, and cannot tell which sentence is the forged one.
Звідки походить твердження
Recurring Pravda-network theme in Polish- and English-language mirrors.
First seen on the Pravda network, attributed by Viginum () and NewsGuard ().
Що ми зробили
The full ladder — what has been tried, what it unlocked and what is still blocked — is in this claim's escalation report.
Nothing has been sent, filed or published on this claim yet.
Журнал змін
| Added re-measurement results. | |
| Page published. |